Letter Boxed January 28, 2026 Answers

Here are the Letter Boxed January 28, 2026 Answers from New York Times Games. Our solutions and answers are 100% valid and accurate. We suggest trying to solve the game on your own before using the help of our website.

Sides of this Letter Box are:

VCUIHDAPRSWO

The answers are:

AVOIRDUPOISSCHWA

18 thoughts on “Letter Boxed January 28, 2026 Answers”

    1. I think that’s a singular answer? I mean one could go schwas, but I’m assuming AVOIRDUPOIS has to be the base here?

      1. I think it’s singular too, but maybe somebody will surprise us. I found some that Wiki accepted but they’re kind of sketchy, like siphovirus—scawd.

  1. Ha, I did it the other way around! SCHWA-AVOIRDUPOIS. I love that it’s reciprocal, so OA in reverse, rather like a chemical equilibrium equation. It didn’t take long, but was so frustrated by RAP at the bottom, which took away options like VORACIOUS, RAPACIOUS, VICARIOUS, etc.

    1. Well done!
      I knew this was going to be hard one as soon as I saw the grid. The V and W really took away most of the options. Was frustrated that AVARICIOUS wasn’t possible. And I wasn’t going to get the OA in a million years, never heard of AVOIRDUPOIS before.

      I’m just glad I threw in the towel early! 24/28

      1. As an afterthought to my earlier comment, I’ve realised that all my recent failures have fallen on Wednesdays. Coincidence? I’d better brace myself for the 4th of February!

        1. Radioactive Flower

          Surrendered after two hours. I would not let set the puzzle overnight and solve in the morning because it makes sleeping difficult by always thinking of words in the background.

          I knew there has to be SCHWA in the OA but my attemps to pair it was futile. And, it is my first time hearing the word AVOIRDUPOIS.

          Today is the end of my winning streak. I failed to match or even surpass my previous record of 32-day winning streak.

          27/28

          1. That is an AMAZING streak, and you’ve gotten some awesome answers; I always keep an eye out for yours.

            It’s such an obscure word, and I’m cross at Sam for cutting off all other pathways – basically, it’s the non-metric system of weights used in Anglophone countries based on the 16 oz pound.

          2. I wasn’t around for your last streak, but have enjoyed watching
            this one…congratulations to you!!

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *